June 2007


BLOG: Publisher's Weekly reviews The Integral Vision by Ken Wilber

The following is a review from Publisher's Weekly of Ken's upcoming book, The Integral Vision, to be released on August 14, 2007.

A Starred Review Coming in PW on Monday, May 28:

The Integral Vision: A Very Short Introduction to the Revolutionary Integral Approach to Life, God, the Universe and Everything

Ken Wilber. Shambhala, $15.95 (224p) ISBN 978-1-59030-475-4



BLOG: ISC Conference Call: Shadow/Disowned Self (TRANSCRIPT)

The following is a transcript taken from a recent Integral Spiritual Center conference call between Ken and Arthur Gillard, discussing Chapter Six (Shadow/Disowned Self) of Integral Spirituality. These calls with Ken take place every other week, and are open to all Integral Spiritual Center members. See http://isc.integralinstitute.org for more details!

Transcribed by Arthur Gillard

Ken Wilber: How are you, buddy?

Arthur Gillard: Good, good. How are you doing?

Ken: Yeah, good, good - we're bouncing right along here. So, well let's go into some of the “shadow stuff of the shadow stuff”. You want to maybe read your questions? Because they're all really good.

Arthur: OK. First question: Although it may be...



TEDTalks : Journey to the center of the Earth ... and beyond! - Bill Stone (2007)

Bill Stone, a maverick cave explorer who has plumbed Earth’s deepest abysses, discusses his efforts to mine lunar ice for space fuel and to build an autonomous robot for studying Jupiter’s moon Europa.



BLOG: Guest Blog: The Ghetto Quartet (by Mark Binet)

The following is being posted according to Ken's generous offer. The posting of a submission doesn't imply that Ken or the editors of this site necessarily agree with any or all of it. Thanks, -Eds

"The primary criterion of integral art is the consciousness of the artist producing it. That is, integral artwork is an artwork produced by integral consciousness. How well the artwork succeeds or not in other categories-technical execution, coherency, clarity, range, style, and so on-are items to be considered in their own right. But whether an artwork is integral is primarily determined by the consciousness that produced it. Not everything that integral consciousness produces is integral art, but all integral art is produced by an integral consciousness."

Ken Wilber, Ken's Foreword to Eyes of the Soul by Philip Rubinov-Jacobson



TEDTalks : New insights on poverty and life around the world - Hans Rosling (2007)

Researcher Hans Rosling uses his cool data tools to show how countries are pulling themselves out of poverty. He demos Dollar Street, comparing households of varying income levels worldwide. Then he does something really amazing.



Evolutionary Robotics, Self-Perception, and Evolutionary Theory


Evolutionary robotics is a relatively new field that integrates evolutionary theory, artificial intelligence, and robotics. Researchers in the field of evolutionary robotics create fitness functions that allow genetic algorithms or robotic controls to evolve over time. Essentially, evolutionary robotics can model processes of evolutionary learning in which a robot can understand and replicate its own form.
Recently, Hod Lipson, a professor in evolutionary robotics at the Cornell University, gave a talk at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society’s annual meeting in Williamsburg, VA. His talk was entitled “What do Robots Dream of? Emergent Self-Models in Machine Minds.” In his talk, he explained that researching robotic systems has not only practical implications (e.g. industrial robotics), but it can also elucidate the complexities of human development, evolution, and human behavior.
During his lecture, he discussed some of the many research projects that he has been working on at Cornell. Two of the projects that were of most interest to me were the robots that cold model there own structure and robots that could self-replicate.
Self-Modeling Robots
Lipson and his colleagues have found that certain fitness functions can allow robots to model and understand their own structure. Although robots do not yet have what we often refer to as consciousness, they do have the ability to recognize changes in their robotic structure through a process of continuous self-modeling. For example, a robot that has five appendages can recognize when one of its appendages is amputated and it can adapt its behavior to be congruent with its new structure.
Self-Replicating Robots
Lipson and his colleagues have also found that they can use certain fitness functions and programming to design robots that can replicate themselves. These robots not only have the ability to model themselves, but they also have the ability to construct a replication of themselves. Although they are not self-replicators to the extent that we are, they can put pre-constructed robotic parts together and essentially recreate themselves.
Evolutionary Robotics and Consciousness
So what does evolutionary robotics have to do with the human perception of consciousness? A couple of months ago, I published a post which described Douglass Hofstader’s perspective on consciousness, which suggests that we are evolved perceivers that have turned our perceptions on ourselves to create the illusion of consciousness and self-perception. Evolutionary robotics may shed a different light on self-perception. Maybe our perception of consciousness and self is nothing more than a self-model which allows us to adapt our behavior to the structure of our biological system.

For futher reading, check out these articles.

Resilient Machines Through Continuous Self-Modeling
Reproducing Robots



BLOG: Guest Blog: Integrative Spirituality: Grounded Contemporary Perspectives (by Bruce Alderman)

The following is being posted according to Ken's generous offer. The posting of a submission doesn't imply that Ken or the editors of this site necessarily agree with any or all of it. Thanks, -Eds

Integrative Spirituality: Grounded Contemporary Perspectives

Bruce Alderman

Coming last in the Integrative Spirituality Symposium has been both a luxury and a burden. I've had the luxury of being able to read and reflect on everyone's contributions before considering what I will bring to the table; but my position in the lineup is also somewhat daunting, because now I have the difficulty of trying to come up with something original after all of these fine posts!

In this essay, I will not attempt a comprehensive statement on the...



The Evolution of Consciousness


The Evolution of Consciousness

A look at a developmental map of consciousness, Spiral Dynamics. Evolution is vertical, are we looking horizontal? Note: Each level, or meme, of the wave is holistic. This means that it includes and transcends former levels. It can go up and down, mix various levels at the same time. It has been compared to a storm or tornado spiral of alternativing waves, but what is also true is that a culture gravitates toward a certain perspective at a particular time. So, yes, each meme here is just ...
From:
thepathlesspath
Views:
22885

84
ratings
Time:
04:55
More in
News & Politics



Integral Politics

In a recent Integral Naked dialogue, "Escaping Flatland, Part II", Wilber discusses the contours of Integral Politics as he sees it. He gives a good summary of the points he has made in the three chapters published so far of his The Many Faces of Terrorism manuscript. These chapters, unfortunately, lack focus. If this, after all those years, is Wilber's choice of genre for conveying his vision of integral politics, we're really lost.

Wilber's conclusion and implicit advice to presidential candidates of the Democratic Party: if Green attacks Orange, Blue wins. Decrypted into normal political language: if left-wing politicians alienate the rationalist, industrialist, secular sections of society by their anti-America rethoric, they will turn to the Republicans and cause them to win the elections. Or as Wilber says it in his usual caricaturistic way: You can't win the elections by saying "I hate my country, vote for me".

However, with all its claim to universality, it is still very much directed at the context of US politics, which has a two-party system of Liberals/Democrats and Republicans. It's high time to turn to other countries for a wider view. In the Netherlands, for example, the liberals are on the right-hand side of the political spectrum, and usually conservative. On the left-hand side we have, of course, the socialists (and even communists). And in the middle, we have the Christian party. Currently we have a Christian-Left government.

A few years back, we had a "purple" cabinet, which was a joining of both left (red) and right wing (blue) parties (our socialists and conervatives) -- integral politics in action! Its architect was a very small party called Democrats '66, which, led by the charismatic Hans van Mierlo, had starting arguing in favor of such a venture since the sixties). It lasted for 2 terms, until the Dutch population got tired of the rationality of the whole construction (yes, half-truths generate more passion!). When the death of Pim Fortuyn occurred, the Christian party took hold of the vacuum and presided over 4 terms.

So integral political analysis has to move from a US based 2-party to 3-party or multi-party analysis. It also seems to have no realistic idea of Left Wing politics. Does the US really have a Left? The democratic party would still count as conservative over here (and the Republicans as ultra-conservative). And as to the US situation, a bigger problem seems to me that, given the 50/50 nature of the division between Democrats and Republicans, as evidenced by the last election, any third party arriving on the scene wil only weaken the one closest to it, and so give victory to the opposition (e.g. a really Left wing party will weaken the Democrats, by stealing their votes). Same story on the Right wing of the spectrum (who remembers Ross Perot?).

And please, please, please, when can we finally read about these parts of integral theory WITHOUT having to wade through adolescent prose, giggling dialogues, and self-congratulatory praise ("we are decades ahead of everybody")? Can this be fleshed out in a serious way, that attracts the attention of those who really know about politics, both in theory and in practice? Without the AQAL jargon, endlessly discussed, summarized and explained, the color coding terminology, which doesn't make sense to and even offends outsiders, and the inside jokes?


User login